Bikers not happy with Huguenot Bridge replacement plan

Huguenot Bridge will be completely replaced by 2013By Phil Riggan – James River News Hub

There is a certain risk involved in driving across the patched and bumpy old Huguenot Bridge. That risk is even greater if you are running or biking.

Nearly 28,000 automobiles cross the James River each day by way of the bridge, which was constructed in 1949. It is scheduled to undergo a major three-year reconstruction beginning  in January at the estimated price tag of $51 million.

I was not able to attend an information meeting about the plan Tuesday night at Bon Air Elementary School, but I was told many outdoor enthusiasts expressed their displeasure with the reconstruction.

If Richmond is really ready to plan for more greenways and to “rethink our streets” as Mayor Dwight Jones’s Bike, Pedestrian and Trails Commission declared in September, then the time is now, starting with the Huguenot Bridge project. It is a key link for Richmond’s fitness community. Bikers and runners are constantly using the bridge to get to Riverside Drive and the James River Park.

According to VDOT’s plan, the new structure will have one 12 foot lane and one 10 foot shoulder in each direction. There will be a five foot wide sidewalk on each side for pedestrians. The 10 foot shoulder is expected to function as both an emergency pull over and a lane to allow bicyclists to safely use the bridge. The existing bridge is one lane in each direction with a narrow pedestrian sidewalk and no shoulders.

The of the best things about the current bridge is the excellent sight lines of the James River both east and west as you cross the structure. With the new span, the sight lines will be obstructed —  as people found out at the meeting — because of federal regulations requiring higher railings.

With Richmond’s promise to dedicate the “Complete Streets” method of planning for cars, pedestrians, bikers and public transit when upgrading roadways, there was much discussion and opposition to the lack of designated bike lanes on the bridge and as well as leading to and away from the span. 

Many people were concerned that the mistakes made with the reconstruction of the Boulevard Bridge (too narrow, not enough consideration for bikers and walkers) will be made with the Huguenot Bridge.

One man spoke to me about the current plan, alleging that the best bikers can hope for is signage that designates “walkers use the sidewalk, bikers use the shoulder, cars use the roadway.” People at the meeting that opposed the lack of designated bike lanes in the plan said that safety is an issue, but it is also one of respect.

Advertisements

9 responses to “Bikers not happy with Huguenot Bridge replacement plan

  1. Would using plexiglass or something that is clear and strong for the railings be allowed in order to keep the sight lines?

  2. I have attended all the meetings, and I disagree with the commentary about bike lanes. The proposal is not for a “bike lane”. It is for a full width extra lane, to be used for bikes and for emergencies. This design is a very good deal for bikers…more width, more safety, and less conflict with pedestrians.

    • Thanks for clarifying, David. This is what happens when uninformed people with too much free time are allowed internet access.

  3. My understanding was that it will be designed similarly to the Lee Bridge, which is MUCH easier to bike over than Huguenot.

  4. Perhaps they won’t paint white bicycles on the lane but 10 feet seems plenty wide to me, especially since it will be on both sides. What matters more is what happens to those shoulders once you get back on Huguenot or Cary Street Road.

    • Thank you Jeff. That’s the point, and I don’t think my writing made that distinction clear. Bike lanes are important with the approach and exit of the bridge. Amy’s point about the Lee Bridge is a good comparison. Are there bike lanes designated on the Lee Bridge? If so, are the lanes on the roadway before and after the bridge?

  5. Pingback: Bikers not happy with Huguenot Bridge replacement plan | City Hall Review

  6. As a cyclist, I would be satisfied with the 10-foot lane to ride in. Improved ingress/egress for pedestrians and cyclists should be strongly requested.

  7. Pingback: Hills and Heights » Huguenot Bridge Construction Detours - Richmond, Virginia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s